Thompson v. Burlington Industries
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Judge.
Plaintiffs first argument is that the Industrial Commission erred in denying her claim for temporary total disability and medical expenses resulting from her occupational disease.
An occupational disease must be “proven to be due to causes and conditions which are characteristic of and peculiar to a particular trade, occupation or employment, but excluding all ordinary diseases of life to which the general public is equally exposed outside of the employment.” G.S. 97-53(13). If the medical evidence tends to show that plaintiff suffers from an ordinary disease of life to which the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Morrison v. Burlington IndustriesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Walston v. Burlington IndustriesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- Walston v. Burlington IndustriesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- Lynch v. M. B. Kahn Construction Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
3Cited by11 opinions
- Porter v. Fieldcrest Cannon, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
- Allen v. Roberts Electrical ContractorsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- Guy v. Burlington IndustriesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Carroll v. Burlington IndustriesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Thompson v. Tyson Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.