Legal Opinion

Smith v. Pacific Bell Telephone Co., Inc.

District Court, E.D. California

Decided August 12, 2009No. CV-F-06-1756 OWW/DLBPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION RE DEFENDANTS COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS OF AMERICA LOCAL 9333 UNION AND COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS OF AMERICA DISTRICT 9 UNION’S MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Docs. 38, 43) AND MOTIONS TO STRIKE (Docs. 109,114)

OLIVER W. WANGER, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION.

Plaintiff brings this action pursuant to § 301 of the Labor-Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 185, claiming that his employer, defendant Pacific Bell, Inc. (“Pacific Bell”), terminated him in violation of the collective bargaining agreement between Pacific Bell and Plaintiffs union, defendants District 9 and Local 9333 of…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Greer v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.District Court, E.D. California · 2017
  2. Nosie v. ASSOCIATION OF FLIGHT ATTENDANTS-CWADistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2010
  3. (PC) Wheatley v. DominguezDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
  4. Anders v. California State University, FresnoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  5. Logisys, Inc. v. WilliamsDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2022

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API