Smith v. Pacific Bell Telephone Co., Inc.
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION RE DEFENDANTS COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS OF AMERICA LOCAL 9333 UNION AND COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS OF AMERICA DISTRICT 9 UNION’S MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Docs. 38, 43) AND MOTIONS TO STRIKE (Docs. 109,114)
OLIVER W. WANGER, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION.
Plaintiff brings this action pursuant to § 301 of the Labor-Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 185, claiming that his employer, defendant Pacific Bell, Inc. (“Pacific Bell”), terminated him in violation of the collective bargaining agreement between Pacific Bell and Plaintiffs union, defendants District 9 and Local 9333 of…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Greer v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.District Court, E.D. California · 2017
- Nosie v. ASSOCIATION OF FLIGHT ATTENDANTS-CWADistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2010
- (PC) Wheatley v. DominguezDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
- Anders v. California State University, FresnoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- Logisys, Inc. v. WilliamsDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2022
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.