Legal Opinion
(PC) Wheatley v. Dominguez
District Court, E.D. California
Decided January 16, 2025No. 1:20-cv-00481Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RICARDO WHEATLEY, Case No.: 1:20-cv-00481-CDB 12 Plaintiff, ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO COMPEL PLAINTIFF’S 13 v. DISCOVERY RESPONSES AND DEEM ADMISSIONS ADMITTED 14 D. DOMINGUEZ, et al., (Doc. 43) 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Ricardo Wheatley is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights 18 action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. section 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment 19 excessive force claims against Defendants Dominguez and Flores, Eighth Amendment failure to 20…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Houston v. LackSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Douglas v. NoelleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- William Hunt v. County of OrangeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Michael J. Conlon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Dichter-Mad Family Partners, LLP v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.