Legal Opinion
In the Interest of C.T.G.
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided August 9, 2007No. 05CA0783PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge ROTHENBERG.
P.G. (father) and T.L.W. (mother) (collectively, the parents) appeal from the trial court’s orders denying them request to terminate the parenting time awarded to K.R.W. (stepfather) for their minor child, C.T.G., and the trial court’s award of attorney fees to stepfather. Because we conclude that stepfather lacks standing to seek parenting time and that even if he had standing, he would not be entitled to parenting time, we reverse the orders related to stepfather’s parenting time and the order awarding him attorney fees, and we remand with directions to grant the…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Reno v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States Parole Commission v. GeraghtySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- In Re the Parental Responsibilities of ReeseColorado Court of Appeals · 2010
- Pierce v. FrancisColorado Court of Appeals · 2008
- In re the Parental Responsibilities of M.W.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2012
- Goodman v. ForsenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
- Peo in the Interest of NGGColorado Court of Appeals · 2020
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.