Legal Opinion

Goodman v. Forsen

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided January 28, 2016No. 1 CA-CV 14-0844 FCPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SWANN, Judge:

¶ 1 In 2013, the legislature amended A.R.S. § 25-409 to require that a court give “special weight” to a parent’s decision to oppose visitation between a child and a nonparent. We hold that a parent opposing visitation does not bear the burden of proof under this statute, and that “special weight” means the party seeking visitation must prove that a fit parent’s decision to deny visitation would substantially impair the child’s best interests.

¶ 2 In this ease, the court ordered visitation under AR.S. § 25-409 in favor of the former girlfriend of a fit mother. Though the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. In Re K.H.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2015
  3. In the Interest of C.T.G.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Nash v. NashCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lisa Friedman v. David C Roels JrArizona Supreme Court · 2018
  2. In re the Marriage of FriedmanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
  3. Paul E. v. Courtney F.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
  4. Gann v. GannCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
  5. In re the Marriage of FriedmanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API