Legal Opinion

Yelverton v. . Yelverton

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 1, 1926PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrogdbn, J.

Two questions are presented for determination:

1st. "Who are the heirs at law of the testatrix, Mary Emma Aycock, with respect to the 222-acre farm, under the clause of the will devising “all the rest, or other half, residue and remainder of my real and personal estate, I give, devise and bequeath to my heirs at law?”

2d. Who are the heirs at law of the testatrix, Mary Emma Aycock, with respect to her personal property ?

The term “heirs at law,” so far as real estate is concerned, signifies those who would have taken or been entitled to the property had the testatrix died intestate; or, in other…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Reid v. . NealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  2. Kirkman v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  3. Poisson v. . PettawaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  4. Gillespie v. . FoySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1848
  5. Wilkerson v. . BrackenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1842

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Welch v. . GibsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  2. Brown v. . MitchellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  3. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co. v. LindsaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  4. Clark v. . ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  5. Doggett v. . VaughanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API