Legal Opinion

Clark v. . Clark

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 28, 1927PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBuogdeN, J.

Where real estate is devised to “nearest heirs at law” of a person leaving brothers and sisters of whole blood and half blood, do such brothers and sisters take equally, or do the brothers and sisters of the whole blood take the entire interest to the exclusion of the half blood?

Under the fifth item of the will of Joseph G-. Williams it was provided that, if Cleveland Williams “should die without heirs,” all the real estate bequeathed to him “shall go back to my beloved wife or her nearest heirs at law.” Amelia G-. Williams, wife of testator, died, leaving a half brother, two half sisters,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kirkman v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  2. Massengill v. . AbellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  3. Yelverton v. . YelvertonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Brown v. . MitchellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  2. Peel Ex Rel. Daniel v. CoreySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  3. Edwards v. . FaulknerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  4. Cox v. . HeathSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API