Legal Opinion

Wachovia Bank & Trust Co. v. Lindsay

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 4, 1936PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

Are those “who would have been” the testator’s “heirs and distributees,” had he died intestate, and who are designated as the ultimate takers of two-thirds of his property, to be ascertained and determined as of the date of his death, or at the time of the death of the life tenant? The answer is, At the death of the testator. Witty v. Witty, 184 N. C., 375, 144 S. E., 482; Dixon v. Pender, 188 N. C., 792, 125 S. E., 623; Baugham v. Trust Co., 181 N. C., 406, 107 S. E., 431.

Had the testator died without making a will, undoubtedly his heirs and distributees would have been determined as of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bowen v. Hackney.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  2. Witty v. WittySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  3. Scales v. . BarringerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  4. Jenkins v. . LambethSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  5. Welch v. . GibsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Peele v. FinchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  2. Holland v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  3. Kale v. ForrestSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. Central Carolina Bank & Trust Company v. BassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  5. Weill v. . WeillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API