Legal Opinion

Poisson v. . Pettaway

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 3, 1912PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal by defendant from Carter, J., at July Term, 1912, of New HaNover. Civil action. From a judgment for plaintiffs, the defendants appealed. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the Court by Mr. Justice Brown.

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

Jebu Poisson purchased the lot in controversy and died in 1873, devising it in fee to his daughter Sarah, who died in 1906, devising it in fee to her brother and only heir at law, Janies Dickson Poisson. He died in 1910, intestate, seized of the .property, never having married, leaving no brother or sister or issue of such.

The plaintiffs are the nearest collateral relatives of James D. and Sarah Poisson, of the blood of their father, Jehu Poisson.

The defendants are equally related to James Dickson and Sarah through their mother, the wdfe of Jehu Poisson, but are not of the blood of the latter.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gardner v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
  2. Wilkerson v. . BrackenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1842
  3. Bell v. . DozierSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1827

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of LittleWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Elledge v. WelchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  3. Ex Parte BarefootSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  4. Yelverton v. . YelvertonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  5. Jones v. . JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API