Legal Opinion

Bowers v. Max Kaufmann & Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 14, 1927No. 170PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MANTON, Circuit Judge.

For the taxable year 1918, the defendant in error paid $15,176.15, with interest as additional excess profits tax, under protest. It sued to recover this sum and was successful below. The defendant in error and its affiliated company, Hallukk Texstyle Corporation, both New York corporations, filed a consolidated return for that year. The basis of the suit for the return of the tax paid is the erroneous deduction by the Internal Revenue Commissioner of sums of money from its invested capital. Such reduction from invested capital caused an increase in the excess profits…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Ware v. HyltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1796
  3. New York & Oswego Midland Railroad v. Van HornNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  4. Buffalo Jamestown Railroad Co. v. . GiffordNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  5. Jeffery v. . SelwynNew York Court of Appeals · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Daily Pantagraph, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1929
  2. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. JamesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
  3. First Bancredit Corp. v. Flexlume Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API