Legal Opinion
Chase v. Peay
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided September 30, 2003No. CIV.A. CCB-98-2367PublishedCited by 235 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
BLAKE, District Judge.
The defendants, Phlonda Peay, et al. (“defendants”), have moved for summary judgment against the plaintiff, Warren Chase (“plaintiff’ or “Chase”). 1 The issues in this motion have been fully briefed and no hearing is necessary. 2 Local Rule 105.6. For the reasons stated below, the motion for summary judgment will be granted.
BACKGROUND
Chase alleges that the defendants, employees of the Maryland Division of Correction, subjected him to cruel and inhuman conditions and used excessive force against him during Chase’s confinement at the Maryland Correctional…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Porter v. NussleSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Booth v. ChurnerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Rodosvaldo Pozo v. Gary McCaughtry Randall Gerritson, and David HautamakiCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by235 opinions
- Kitchen v. IckesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2015
- Chase v. PeayCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004
- Collins v. GoordDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Potts v. Howard UniversityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010
- Shaidon Blake v. Micheal Ross, Sgt.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
230 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.