Legal Opinion
Potts v. Howard University
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided August 12, 2010No. Civil Action No. 08-0706 (RMU)PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
RICARDO M. URBINA, District Judge.
Denying the Defendants’ Motion for a More Definite Statement
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter comes before the court on the motion for a more definite statement filed by the defendants, Howard University and Howard University Hospital.1 The plaintiff, proceeding pro se at the time,2 brought suit in April 2008, alleging that the defendants discriminated against him on the basis of his gender and military service obligations in violation of the District of Columbia Code, §§ 2-1401.01 et seq., and the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Michael Massey and John Otten, M.D. v. David HelmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- American Nurses' Association v. State of IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Doe v. RumsfeldDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Sky Angel U.S., LLC v. National Cable Satellite CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Anderson v. Philip Morris USA Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2021
- Diggs v. Flagger Force, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2025
- Doe v. RumsfeldDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.