Legal Opinion

Hanold v. Raytheon Co.

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided September 30, 2009No. Civil Action H-03-734PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

MELINDA HARMON, District Judge.

Presently before the Court are Defendants’ Raytheon Company (Raytheon), Raytheon Aircraft Company (RAC), Raytheon Travel Air (RTA), Raytheon Aircraft Services (RAS), Raytheon Aircraft Charter and Management (RACM), and Flight Options, LLC’s (Flight Options) (collectively, Defendants) motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim (Doc. 26); Defendants’ joint motion for summary judgment (Doc. 63); Defendants’ motions to strike (Docs. 68 & 84); Plaintiff Reinhardt Carl Frederick Hanold, IV’s (Hanold) motions to strike (Docs. 75 & 76); and…

2Cases cited65 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Safeshred, Inc. v. MartinezTexas Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Howe v. YellowbookDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2011
  3. Ulysse v. AAR Aircraft Component ServicesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2012
  4. Allamon v. Acuity Specialty Products, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API