Ulysse v. AAR Aircraft Component Services
District Court, E.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER
SPATT, District Judge.
The Plaintiff in this case, Robinson Ulysse, commenced an action in New York State court pursuant to New York State Labor Law § 740 for retaliation in the work place. The Defendants, AAR Aircraft Component Services, AAR Parts *664Trading, Inc., AAR Aircraft & Engine Group, Inc., AAR Aviation Trading, Inc., and AAR Allen Aircraft Corp. (collectively “AAR”), as well as the individual Defendants Joe DeLardi, Ian Smith, and Salim Kemzy, subsequently removed the case to federal court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1441 and 1446. Presently before the…
2Cases cited93 opinions
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp. v. SheetsSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Khelifa v. ChertoffDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2006
- Mihok v. Medtronic, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2015
- Hamilton v. United Airlines, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2012
- Bank of America, NA v. Public Administrator of Suffok County as Administrator of the Estate of Alice G. ZahndDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2025
- Bank of America, NA., Mortgage Assets Management, LLC v. Henry R. TerryDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2026
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.