State v. Hudson
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
FELDMAN, Vice Chief Justice.
In this appeal submitted without argument, defendant, Johnny Hudson, 1 challenges his life sentence imposed pursuant to A.R.S. § 13-604.02(A). 2 He claims the sentence was illegally imposed because the state failed to adequately prove, as the sentencing statute requires, that he was on parole or some other form of release status during the commission of the offense. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Ariz. Const, art. 6, § 5(3) and A.R.S. §§ 13-4031 and -4033. We affirm.
FACTS
This case comes before us for the second time. A detailed recitation of the facts underlying…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- State v. LeonArizona Supreme Court · 1969
- State v. LaGrandArizona Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. HurleyArizona Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. WilliamsArizona Supreme Court · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. RichardsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
- State v. MartinezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
- State v. GeeslinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- State v. OsbornCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- State v. CastillejoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019