Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Arbatosky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 20, 2003PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 5, 2001, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ruling that claimant lost her employment as a legal secretary due to disqualifying misconduct. As a legal secretary, claimant was aware of the confidential nature of her employment. Nevertheless, claimant admittedly copied letters contained in personnel files of former…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of RothmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. Taylor v. SelskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. In re the Claim of ReiferAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of KaissarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. In re the Claim of CulpAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  3. In re the Claim of GodfreyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  4. In re the Claim of GodfreyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API