Legal Opinion

Schultz v. Dennison

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1909No. Docket No. 89PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Kent; Perkins, J. Trover by Lawrence Schultz against Ella R. Dennison. A judgment for defendant on a verdict directed by the court is reviewed by plaintiff on writ of error.

1Opinion of the CourtBlair, J.

This is an action of trover to recover the value of certain shocks of corn. On the 87th day of June, 1908, the defendant, Ella R. Dennison, was divorced from her husband, William H. Dennison, by decree of the circuit court for the county of Kent, in chancery. This decree, after setting off certain lands to the said Ella, left 80 acres of land to the said William. Subsequent to the making of the decree, the said Ella obtained title to an undivided one-half of the 80 acres through tax deeds. In 1906, and again in April, 1907, the plaintiff entered into cropping agreements with William H.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lebarron v. . BabcockNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. Fenton v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Tharp v. AllenMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Campau v. BarnardMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  5. McDaniels v. WalkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1880

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Henkel v. HenkelMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Frenzel v. HayesMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Nott v. GundickMichigan Supreme Court · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API