Nott v. Gundick
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Wayne; Hosmer (George S.), J. Bill by Lettie Nott against Martha Gundick for partition of certain real estate. Edward E. Hill was permitted to intervene and filed a cross-bill, claiming an interest in the property. From a decree for plaintiff, defendant and intervener appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.
On December 1, 1914, Albert Eastman entered into a land contract to sell and convey two lots in the city of Detroit to Albert Gundick and Martha, his wife, for a consideration of $2,600. On April 18, 1919, a decree of divorce dissolving their marriage was granted. In this decree each of the parties was awarded an undivided one-half interest in the equity they had under the land contract in the two lots. This decree was supplemented by another, made on May 12, 1919, which awarded the entire interest under the Eastman contract to Albert on condition that he should pay to Martha the sum of $555.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Fenton v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
- Hoffman v. BeardMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
- Overton's Heirs v. WoolfolkCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1838
- Fenton v. SteereMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Gundick v. GundickMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Frenzel v. HayesMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
- Nott v. GundickMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
- Falkner v. FalknerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
- In Re GundryMichigan Supreme Court · 1926