Legal Opinion

Lewis v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 11, 1932No. 4313PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTaliaferro, J.

Plaintiff is the holder of a twenty-year payment plan life insurance policy issued by the defendant company to which is attached, as part thereof, a supplementary contract pro-, viding for the waiver of premiums and payment of a monthly income to the insured, under certain conditions. To secure the benefits stipulated in the supplementary contract, plaintiff paid 57 cents per annum. The pertinent portions of this contract, those having direct bearing upon the issues in this case, we quote:

“Metropolitan Life Insurance Company * * * hereby agrees that upon receipt ⅜ * * of due proof * ⅜ ⅜ that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ginell v. . the Prudential Insurance Company of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  2. Ginell v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
  3. Hawkins v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  4. Shipp v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Conley v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Maze v. Equitable Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  2. New England Mutual Life Insurance v. HurstCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938
  3. Pearlman v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  4. Brown v. Life Casualty Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1933
  5. Frey v. Manhattan Life Ins. Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1935

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API