Legal Opinion
Globe Indemnity Co. v. Larkin
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 14, 1944No. Civ. No. 12527PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.
Plaintiff, having sustained a loss upon two broker’s bonds, brought this action against the indemnitors upon certain indemnification agreements given to plaintiff at the time of the issuance of said bonds in 1929 and 1930. The action resulted in judgment in favor of plaintiff and against defendant Neil E. Larkin in the sum of $8,656.11. Said defendant appeals from said judgment.
The sole contention on this appeal is that the action was barred by the statute of limitations (Code Civ. Proc. 337, subd. 1). It is therefore necessary to set forth the pertinent portions of the indemnification…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Oaks v. ScheifferlyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Easton v. Boston Investment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1921
- Ramey v. HopkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Thomas v. LayerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
3Cited by13 opinions
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Mack Trucks, Inc. v. Bendix-Westinghouse Automotive Air Brake Company v. Latrobe Die Castingcompany, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
- Alberts v. American Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1948
- Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. WhitsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Superintendent of Insurance of the State of New York v. Livestock Market Insurance Agency, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.