Legal Opinion
Ramey v. Hopkins
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 25, 1934No. Civ. No. 5098PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.
The plaintiff had judgment in the sum of $1,021.03 against the defendants for and on account of the alleged failure to comply with the terms of a certain building contract entered into between the plaintiff and the defendant Frank Hopkins and a certain indemnity bond executed and delivered by the Central Surety and Insurance Corporation, a corporation. From this judgment the defendants appeal.
Upon this appeal three questions are tendered for our consideration, only one of which needs to be answered, to wit: May an obligee upon an indemnity against loss or damages, recover against the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Roberts v. Security Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- W. P. Fuller & Co. v. Alturas School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
- Eva v. AndersenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Ryan v. ShannahanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Roberts v. Security T. S. BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Gribaldo, Jacobs, Jones & Associates v. Agrippina Versicherunges A. G.California Supreme Court · 1970
- Alberts v. American Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1948
- San Pedro Properties, Inc. v. Sayre & Toso, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1962
- Louisville Title Insurance v. Surety Title & Guaranty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1976
- Globe Indemnity Co. v. LarkinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.