Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Layer

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 15, 1920No. Civ. No. 3111PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.

Defendants appeal from a judgment entered against them. The action was brought upon an undertaking given by Wilson as principal and Layer and Schenck as sureties to indemnify the plaintiff, who was a constable, for a liability which might accrue against him. Wilson was plaintiff in a certain civil action, in which action he required the plaintiff as constable to attach an automobile, which automobile was later claimed by a third party. Upon the demand of the third party the constable was about, to release the property, when the undertaking was given upon which this action was brought. Because…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Murdock v. BrooksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  2. Coburn v. BrooksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Pierce v. WhitingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
  4. McBeth & Compton v. McIntyreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Oaks v. ScheifferlyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Peter Culley & Associates v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  2. Alberts v. American Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1948
  3. Globe Indemnity Co. v. LarkinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API