State v. Caudle
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
VAUGHN, Judge.
Defendant first assigns error to the denial of his motions to dismiss at the close of State’s and all the evidence. Defendant presented evidence at trial following denial of his initial motion to dismiss and thereby waived the right to challenge that denial. G.S. 15-173; State v. Hough, 299 N.C. 245, 262 S.E. 2d 268 (1980). Defendant’s motion to dismiss made at the close of all the evidence is before this Court for review, and we conclude that denial of that motion was proper.
Defendant contends that the motion should have been allowed because State introduced uncontradicted…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. AbernathySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. McEachernSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- State v. BarbourSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. HoughSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- State v. KingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. HarvellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
- State v. O'NEALCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- State v. StaleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- State v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- State v. CaudleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983