Legal Opinion

State v. Staley

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 6, 1984No. 8318SC1217PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHILLIPS, Judge.

Defendant contends that his motion to dismiss, made at the end of all the evidence, should have been granted for two reasons: First, because of a fatal variance between the indictment and proof; and, second, because the evidence was insufficient to warrant his conviction. Though these are good grounds for dismissal in appropriate cases, this is not such a case. The variance between the indictment and proof in this case was of no consequence. In the bill of indictment, due to a typographical error, defendant was charged with the murder of Raleigh Edward Mortez, whereas the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. WilkersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. State v. . UtleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  3. State v. UtleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  4. State v. CaudleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. McKoyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  2. State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API