State v. Staley
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
PHILLIPS, Judge.
Defendant contends that his motion to dismiss, made at the end of all the evidence, should have been granted for two reasons: First, because of a fatal variance between the indictment and proof; and, second, because the evidence was insufficient to warrant his conviction. Though these are good grounds for dismissal in appropriate cases, this is not such a case. The variance between the indictment and proof in this case was of no consequence. In the bill of indictment, due to a typographical error, defendant was charged with the murder of Raleigh Edward Mortez, whereas the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. WilkersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. . UtleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- State v. UtleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- State v. CaudleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. McKoyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999