Legal Opinion

California Fire-Roasted v. Olam West Coast CA3

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 23, 2021No. C086686MUnpublished

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 4/23/21 California Fire-Roasted v. Olam West Coast CA3 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Sacramento) ---- CALIFORNIA FIRE-ROASTED LLC, C086686 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. 34-2014- 00170784-CU-BC-GDS) v. ORDER PARTIALLY…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Miller v. Department of CorrectionsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Doers v. Golden Gate Bridge, Higway & Transportation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Wolf v. Walt Disney Pictures and TelevisionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  5. Whyte v. Schlage Lock CompanyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API