Legal Opinion

Korobchuk's Case

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 28, 1931PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarroll, J.

The employee was injured .October 15, 1929, while at work on a heavy punch press, and was paid compensation under the workmen’s compensation statute for the loss of the terminal phalange of the forefinger, the entire terminal phalange and half of the second phalange of the second and ring fingers, and the entire terminal phalange of the little finger of the left hand. He returned to work on a light punch press December 16, 1929. It was found *536that the employee was partially incapacitated and unable to do the work he did before he was injured because of the condition of his left hand; that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pigeon's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  2. Johnson's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  3. Ogden v. AspinwallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
  4. Capone's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  5. Driscoll's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Di Clavio's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  2. Perkins's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  3. Pierce's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
  4. Indrisano's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  5. Minns's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API