City of Tacoma v. Peterson
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBeals, J.
— The city of Tacoma instituted this action against Bussell C. Peterson, who served as city controller from June, 1928, to November, 1929, and the surety on Mr. Peterson’s official bond. In its complaint, plaintiff stated two causes of action, it being alleged in the first that one O. E. Torkelson, being indebted to the city in the sum of $2,500, executed and delivered his promissory note, bearing date November 17,1926, due in two years, whereby he promised to pay to the city the amount of his indebtedness, together with interest at the rate of six per cent per annum, the note being endorsed…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Grider v. TallySupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
- Mines v. Del ValleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Neacy v. DrewWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
- State v. HowardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1909
- Wilcox v. PorthWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. AdamsWashington Supreme Court · 1987
- Whatcom County v. LanglieWashington Supreme Court · 1952
- Spaniol Ford, Inc. v. FroggattWyoming Supreme Court · 1970
- City of Tacoma v. PetersonWashington Supreme Court · 1933