Legal Opinion

Neacy v. Drew

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 1922PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Appeal from an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee county: Lawrence W. Halsey, Circuit Judge. The appeal is from an order sustaining the demurrer, of the defendant Universal Concrete -Products Company to the complaint.

1Opinion of the CourtDoerfler, J.

The action is one brought by the plaintiff as a resident and taxpayer of the city of Milwaukee, on his own behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated, to recover from the defendants, for the benefit of said city, the sum of $155,204.62, with interest, such sum representing the amount paid by the city of Milwaukee, through its officers, to the defendant Universal Concrete Products Company on a certain contract entered into between said city of Milwaukee and said Products Company, which contract is alleged in the complaint as being void for reasons therein specified.

The defendant…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Chippewa Bridge Co. v. City of DurandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Frederick v. Douglas CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Johnson v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Boyd v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Cawker v. Central Bitulithic Paving Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1909

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Stanson v. MottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Wester v. BeloteSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
  3. Shulse v. City of MayvilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Ellefson v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Madison Metropolitan Sewerage District v. SteinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API