Legal Opinion

Madison Railways Co. v. Railroad Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1924PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinion was filed April 8, 1924:

Doerfler, J.

Unless relieved by the city from the expense of paving within the track zone, the cost of construction and operation of the extension would impair the earnings of the company so as to prevent an adequate or fair return. Such is the finding of the Commission. The precise question, therefore, presented and which we are called upon to determine is whether the Commission has the power to malee such a conditional order. The Railroad Commission is an administrative body, created by the statutes, possessing neither legislative nor judicial…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. v. Railroad Commission of WisconsinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
  2. City of Eau Claire v. Wisconsin-Minnesota Light & Power Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Monroe v. Railroad CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1919
  4. State ex rel. City of Milwaukee v. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Nekoosa-Edwards Paper Co. v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Chippewa Power Co. v. Railroad CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
  3. City of Milwaukee v. Railroad CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Madison Rys. Co. v. City of MadisonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1939
  5. Breckheimer v. Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API