Legal Opinion

City of Eau Claire v. Wisconsin-Minnesota Light & Power Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 10, 1922PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinions were filed July 8, 1922:

Owen, J.

While the lower court reversed the order of the commission principally for the reason that an undue proportion of the investment made in the Wissota dam was charged to the Loop and used as a basis for fixing the reasonable rates to be paid by the users of electric current situated on the Loop, we deem it unnecessary to review the finding of the lower court in that respect for the reason that our decision will be placed upon a broader and more fundamental consideration. We deem it proper to suggest, however, that a court should proceed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Madison v. Madison Gas & Electric Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Oshkosh Water Works Co. v. Railroad CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co. v. Railroad CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
  4. State ex rel. Wisconsin Traction, Light, Heat & Power Co. v. Circuit Court for Winnebago CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Wabash Valley Electric Co. v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Jack Lewis, Inc. v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1933
  3. Friends of the Earth v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  4. State v. Wisconsin Telephone Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Waukesha Gas & Electric Co. v. Railroad CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API