Legal Opinion

Karen v. Parciak-Karen

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided March 26, 1996No. 14066PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGlass, J.

In this dissolution action, the plaintiff, Richard L. Karen, appeals from the trial court’s assignment of certain funds to the defendant Karen Parciak-Karen. The plaintiff claims that the trial court abused its discretion and improperly held (1) that the plaintiff made an inter vivos gift to the marital estate when he converted certain bank accounts, formerly in the plaintiffs name alone, to joint bank accounts in the names of the plaintiff and the defendant, and (2) that the defendant was entitled to have assigned to her a portion of the plaintiffs inheritance. We affirm the judgment of the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Solomon v. AbermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  2. Dubicki v. DubickiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  3. Graham v. GrahamConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
  4. Rummel v. RummelConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
  5. North v. NorthSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Werblood v. BirnbachConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
  2. Rolla v. RollaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
  3. Bowers v. BowersConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
  4. Martin v. MartinConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API