Legal Opinion
Frank v. Harjo
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 18, 1930No. 19203PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DIEFENDAEFER, O'.
This is an action by Chuckaleesa Harjo in the district court of McIntosh county to recover possession of and quiet title to certain lands in McIntosh county.
The parties will he referred to as in the trial court.
Plaintiff alleges that he is a duly enrolled full-blood citizen of the Creek Nation; that Rose Stidham, a duly enrolled citizen of the Creek Nation, was, during her lifetime, allotted the land in question; that she died August 9, 1902, leaving no‘ husband or ⅛-sue, or brother or sister, or father or mother, but leaving a niece, Rina HarjO', the daughter of a deceased…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Reaves v. ReavesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1905
- Dodson Williams v. ParsonsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Gray v. McKnightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- In Re Estate of HeatonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- White v. StrotherSupreme Court of Alabama · 1847
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Winters v. BirchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Mulkey v. AnglinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Ware v. BeachSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
- In Re Noel's HeirshipSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Schaible v. HellerIdaho Supreme Court · 1955
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.