Legal Opinion
Mulkey v. Anglin
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 26, 1933No. 21890PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WELCH. J.
In the trial court W. T. Anglin, Alfred Stevenson, and Forrest M. Darrough, a partnership doing business as the Holdenville Finance Company, as plaintiffs, sued the defendants, Jas. H. Mulkey and R. D. Howell, as partners, doing business as the Mulkey Motor Company, for the balance due on each of 38 promissory notes which were originally executed and made payable to “Mulkey Motor Company ” and were sold to plaintiffs, and in each instance conveyed by general indorsement, “Mulkey Motor Company by Jas. H. Mulkey, Member of the Firm.” The notes were sold and indorsed to plaintiffs at…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bank of Monongahela Valley v. . WestonNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- McGowan v. American Pressed Tan Bark Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Anderson v. Gunther City Coke, Coal & Mining Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Moning Dry Goods Co. v. WisemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Arnold v. HartIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Gamble Robinson Co. v. Carousel PropertiesMontana Supreme Court · 1984
- Wood v. HarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
- Knox v. Eason Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
- United States Casualty Co. v. JacksonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Adkins v. HashSupreme Court of Virginia · 1949
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.