Corcoran v. Northeast Illinois Regional Commuter R.R. Corp.
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McNULTY
After her husband died in a train accident, Mary Corcoran received a settlement offer from the railroads involved in the accident. She talked to Joseph Dowd, a lawyer, who referred her to Corboy & Demetrio (C&D). She signed a contingent fee contract with C&D. The contract included a referral fee for Dowd. C&D eventually advised Mary to accept the offer she received from the railroads. When Mary settled C&D waived its fee, but Dowd demanded his referral fee. The trial court awarded Dowd the fee. Mary now appeals. Because we find no abuse of discretion, we affirm.
On October 11, 1998, a Metra…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Colleen Baer v. First Options of Chicago, Incorporated, Appeal of Davis, Miner, Barnhill & Galland, P.C. v. James R. AntonionoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- In Re Lawrence M.Illinois Supreme Court · 1996
- In Re GerardIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
- Lidecker v. Kendall CollegeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
- Mohr v. Dix Mutual County Fire InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Career Concepts, Inc. v. Synergy, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2007
- In re N.C.Illinois Supreme Court · 2014
- Daniel v. AON Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2011
- Corcoran v. NE ILL. REG. COMMUTER RR CORP.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2003
- United City of Yorkville v. SUGAR GROVEAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.