Langston, Sweet & Freese, P.A. v. Ernster
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVID GAULTNEY, Justice.
In this lawsuit over division of litigation expenses, two law firms and an individual attorney filed special appearance motions challenging the trial court’s jurisdiction over them. The trial court denied the motions, and this interlocutory appeal followed. See Tex. Civ. PRAC. & Rem.Code Ann. § 51.014(7) (Vernon Supp.2007). We conclude the trial court has jurisdiction over the law firms but not the individual attorney.
The Litigation
The law firms of Taylor, Davis & Era- ster (TDE), 1 Langston, Sweet & Freese, P.A. (LSF), and Danks, Simon & Teeuwis-sen (DST)…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- BMC Software Belgium, NV v. MarchandTexas Supreme Court · 2002
- Michiana Easy Livin' Country, Inc. v. HoltenTexas Supreme Court · 2005
- Moki Mac River Expeditions v. DruggTexas Supreme Court · 2007
- CSR LTD. v. LinkTexas Supreme Court · 1996
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Gordon & Doner, P.A. v. JorosCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2009
- Gray, Ritter & Graham, PC Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz, LLC Neblett Beard & Arsenault, LLP Don M. Downing And Adam J. Levitt v. Goldman Phipps PLLC F/K/A Goldman Pennebaker & Phipps, PC Mikal C. Watts, PC And Murray Law FirmCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
- Murray v. EPIC ENERGY RESOURCES, INC., Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2009
- Waller Marine, Inc. v. Scott M. Magie and the Power In.Com, LLCCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
- Gordon & Doner, P.A. v. Jeffrey Joros, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2009
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.