Legal Opinion

Murray v. EPIC ENERGY RESOURCES, INC.

Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)

Decided November 5, 2009No. 09-09-00052-CVPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STEVE McKEITHEN, Chief Justice.

Appellant Patrick W. Murray, Jr. filed an interlocutory appeal from the trial court’s orders denying his special appearance, temporarily enjoining him, denying his motion to compel arbitration, and abating a pending arbitration between Murray and his former employer, appellee Epic Energy Resources, Inc. (“Epic”). Murray also filed a petition for writ of mandamus, in which he also argues that the trial court abused its discretion by denying his motion to compel arbitration, by abating the pending arbitration, and “not ordering the parties[ ] to arbitrate…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. BMC Software Belgium, NV v. MarchandTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Butnaru v. Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Guardian Royal Exchange Assurance, Ltd. v. English China Clays, P.L.C.Texas Supreme Court · 1991

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Adam C. Leonard v. Salinas Concrete, LP, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2015
  2. ABP Holdings, Inc. Frankey J. Anderson, Antonio D. Partee and Wemyth Dewayne Breckenridge v. Rainbow International LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2021
  3. Murray v. EPIC ENERGY RESOURCES, INC., Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2009
  4. in Re: Rio Grande Xarin II, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2010
  5. in Re: Rio Grande Xarin II, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API