North Carolina State Highway Commission v. Hettiger
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.
In passing on the Commission’s motion to strike, the facts alleged in defendants’ further answer are deemed admitted. The question is whether these facts entitle defendant to recover compensation in excess of the fair market value as of March 5, 1965, of the property described in said Exhibit B. See G.S. 136-106(a) (3). If not, the order of Judge Lupton striking the further answer should be affirmed.
G.S. 136-104, in pertinent part, provides: “Upon the filing of the complaint and the declaration of taking and deposit in court, to the use of the person entitled thereto, of the amount of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Barnes v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- Powell AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- North Carolina State Highway Commission v. PearceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- North Carolina State Highway Commission v. York Industrial Center, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Covert AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- City of Charlotte v. Charlotte Park & Recreation CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- NORTH CAROLINA STATE HIGHWAY COM'N v. HettigerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- State Highway Commission v. ReevesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970