Legal Opinion

Covert Appeal

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 28, 1962No. Appeal, 29PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Keim,

This appeal originates from an eminent domain proceedings. The lower court decided that the sellers of the subject property rather than the buyers were entitled to the damages. The buyers have appealed to this Court.

For sometime prior to the 28th day of June, 1956, John Ry chick and Rita Ry chick, his wife (the appellees) were the owners of a 46½ acre parcel of land in Erie County. This farm was used to grow grapes, peaches, cherries and other type of fruit. Just prior to the aforesaid date, John Ry chick and his wife (the appellees) began negotiations with W. R.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brookbank v. Benedum-Trees Oil Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  2. Yuscavage v. HamlinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  3. Powell AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Stafford v. ReedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  2. Starling v. Lake Meade Property Owners Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  3. Wysinski v. MazzottaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Pennsylvania Electric Co. v. WaltmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Chapleski v. Department of TransportationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API