Legal Opinion

Dunn v. Gray

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1964PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSloan, J.

Plaintiffs filed with defendant, the City Treasurer of Salem, an application for a license to collect garbage within the city. The application was refused. For several years the city governing body had adopted the policy of granting a monopoly for that purpose within the city. Plaintiffs then brought this mandamus proceeding to compel the city to issue a license. The trial court refused the writ and plaintiffs appeal.

The case was submitted to the court upon stipulated facts. These facts disclosed that the ordinance previously adopted by the city had granted the exclusive franchise to collect…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Strub v. Village of DeerfieldIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Greyhound Park v. Oregon Racing CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Spencer v. City of MedfordOregon Supreme Court · 1929
  4. State ex rel. v. WebsterOregon Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Dryden v. DalyOregon Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. HollandOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Schmidt v. MastersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
  3. City of Tigard v. WernerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API