Legal Opinion

McKnight v. Land Conservation & Development Commission

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 5, 1984No. CA A29573PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Petitioners seek a ruling under ORS 183.400 that respondent’s temporary rule OAR 660-14-000 is invalid. That rule became effective on July 20, 1983, and was replaced on December 30, 1983, by OAR 660-14-000 through 660-14-040, which are permanent rules. The rule petitioners attack is no longer in existence, and our decision would “merely resolve an abstract question without practical effect.” State ex rel Juv. Dept. v. Holland, 290 Or 765, 767, 625 P2d 1318 (1981). To the extent that the rule may affect petitioners’ rights in other cases, they may renew their attacks in those cases. This case,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. HollandOregon Supreme Court · 1981

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Joint Council of Teamsters 37 v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  2. Reid v. Department of Consumer & Business ServicesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  3. McKnight v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  4. Larsen v. Oregon Department of Fish & WildlifeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  5. Oregon Education Assn. v. Dept. of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API