Legal Opinion
State, Department of Health & Welfare v. Roe
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided June 18, 2003No. 28003PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALTERS, Justice.
This is an appeal from the dismissal of a petition for termination of a parent-child relationship. At the close of the evidence presented by the petitioner, a magistrate judge granted the parent’s motion to dismiss the petition on the basis that the petitioner had failed to prove its case. The magistrate’s decision was reversed by the district court on an intermediate appeal. The parent, Jane Roe, appeals from the district court’s appellate decision. We affirm the order of dismissal entered by the magistrate.
BACKGROUND
The history of this case spans more than a dozen years.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Quick v. CraneIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
- Rasmussen v. MartinIdaho Court of Appeals · 1983
- Viehweg v. ThompsonIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982
- Barber v. HonorofIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Beier v. Lewiston, City OfCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Beier v. City of LewistonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Mary Pandrea v. Kenneth BarrettIdaho Supreme Court · 2016
- Waste Management of Colorado, Inc. v. City of Commerce CityColorado Court of Appeals · 2010
- Eden v. State (In Re Srba Case No. 39576 Subase No. 37-00864)Idaho Supreme Court · 2018
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.