Legal Opinion
Beier v. City of Lewiston
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 14, 2004No. 02-35516PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BERZON, Circuit Judge.
Officer Joedy Mundell and Corporal Brad Mittendorf (collectively “the officers”) arrested Rafael Beier for violating a temporary protection order the terms of which they had neither read nor ascertained from authorized personnel. Beier brought suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, asserting that the arrest was in violation of the Fourth Amendment. The officers appeal from the district court’s denial of their motion, on qualified immunity grounds, for summary judgment. We affirm.
I. BACKGROUND
In June 1997, Beier and his wife, Susan Beier (“Susan”), were in the process of…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Merritt Sharp, III v. County of OrangeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Ramirez v. City of Buena ParkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Larry J. Leaf, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of John P. Leaf, Deceased, Martha A. Leaf, John P. Leaf v. Ronald ShelnuttCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- Gerald Wall, Dr. v. County of Orange, a Political Sub-Division of the State of California H. WatsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- International Action Center v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.