Legal Opinion

City of Dallas v. Pacifico Partners, Ltd.

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided July 23, 2009No. 05-06-01191-CVPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

Justice BRIDGES.

The City of Dallas (City) sought to condemn a pedestrian easement on part of a tract of land owned by Pacifico Partners, Ltd. (Pacifico) Pacifico counterclaimed for its attorneys' fees and expenses under Texas Property Code section 21.019(b). The trial judge rendered judgment condemning the easement and granted Pacifi-eo's counterclaim. Both parties appeal. Pacifico challenges the legal and factual sufficiency of the evidence to support the trial judge's findings and conclusions. The City appeals the award of attorneys' fees and expenses. We sustain the City's…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  2. King Ranch, Inc. v. ChapmanTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Quick v. City of AustinTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  4. IKB Industries (Nigeria) Ltd. v. Pro-Line Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1997
  5. FKM Partnership, Ltd. v. Board of RegentsTexas Supreme Court · 2008

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Young v. Gumfory, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2010
  2. In Re State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2010
  3. Gail Friedman, Jesse Shooter, and Rachel Tamura v. Adrienne Murphrey, Independent of the Estate of Lois Sherbert Shooter, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2026
  4. Milberger Landscaping, Inc. v. the City of San Antonio, Acting by and Through the San Antonio Water System, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2024
  5. in Re the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API