Legal Opinion

IKB Industries (Nigeria) Ltd. v. Pro-Line Corp.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 1997No. 95-0703PublishedCited by 462 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HECHT, Justice.

Here, the sole question is whether requesting findings of fact and conclusions of law following dismissal of a case as a sanction for discovery abuse extends the time for perfecting appeal under Rule 41(a)(1) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. The court of appeals answered no. 901 S.W.2d 568. Under the circumstances of this case, as we explain, we disagree.

IKB Industries (Nigeria) Limited sued Pro-Line Corporation. Pro-Line moved to dismiss IKB’s action as a sanction for discovery abuse. See Tex.R. Civ. P. 215. After a hearing, for which there is no statement of facts,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. TransAmerican Natural Gas Corp. v. PowellTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Chrysler Corp. v. Honorable Robert BlackmonTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Goswami v. Metropolitan Savings & Loan Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Stiles v. Resolution Trust Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Linwood v. NCNB TexasTexas Supreme Court · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by462 opinions

  1. Retzlaff v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2002
  2. Kendrick v. Garcia, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2005
  3. Willms v. Americas Tire Co., Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2006
  4. Tom James of Dallas, Inc. v. Cobb, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2003
  5. Deutsch v. Hoover, Bax & Slovacek, L.L.P., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003

457 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API