Legal Opinion
In Re State
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
Decided November 12, 2010No. 03-10-00260-CVPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVID PURYEAR, Justice.
In November 2009, the State, “acting by and through” the Texas Transportation Commission (the “Commission”) and the Texas Department of Transportation (the “Department”) (cumulatively the “State”), initiated an eminent domain proceeding in order to acquire property from James and Rosemary LeGuin (“the LeGuins”). After the State initiated the proceeding, the Le-Guins asked the State to disclose various documents related to the value of the property to be condemned and to construction plans for the property. The State objected to the request, but the trial court…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- In Re Team Rocket, L.P.Texas Supreme Court · 2008
- In Re Columbia Medical Center of Las Colinas, Subsidiary, L.P.Texas Supreme Court · 2009
- In Re JordenTexas Supreme Court · 2008
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Maziar v. Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- in Re: Tarrant Regional Water District, a Water Control and Improvement DistrictCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
- Charles C. Laidley and Dorothy Laidley v. City of San Marcos, Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2011
- Charles C. Laidley and Dorothy Laidley v. City of San Marcos, Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2011
- City of Dallas v. Highway 205 Farms, LTD, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2014
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.