Legal Opinion

St. John v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 11, 1960No. Civ. 24282PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHEA, J. pro tem. *

Although denominated a petition for writ of prohibition, this is properly a petition for writ of mandate under section 416.3 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Mr. St. John, the petitioner, is the president and a stockholder in Twin Lakes Corporation, a Nevada corporation, hereinafter referred to as the “corporation.” Prior to 1949 the corporation obtained a permit from the California Corporation Commission to sell shares of its stock in the state of California. After several extensions of time, the permit remained in effect until February 1953 at which time the Commissioner of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Stewart v. RamsaySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Lamb v. SchmittSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Page Co. v. MacDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. Parker v. HotchkissU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1849
  5. Murrey v. MurreyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. SkeltonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  2. Severn v. Adidas SportschuhfabrikenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  3. Gaines v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  4. Lyf-Alum, Inc. v. C & M Aluminum Supply Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Minthorne v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API