Legal Opinion

Lyf-Alum, Inc. v. C & M Aluminum Supply Corp.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1966PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHallows, J.

The question on appeal is whether the immunity from service of civil process which is generally extended to nonresident witnesses and litigants in attendance upon a court within this state should be withheld from a nonresident plaintiff in suits which are alleged to be related to the original action. The plaintiffs contend it is the modern rule that a nonresident plaintiff is not immune from service of process where he has commenced litigation if the service is made in a cause related to the subject matter of the litigation commenced by him and the service of the process is on behalf of a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Stewart v. RamsaySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Lamb v. SchmittSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Page Co. v. MacDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. Rizo v. BurruelArizona Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Stewart v. McCauleyNebraska Supreme Court · 1965

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Severn v. Adidas SportschuhfabrikenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  2. Pointer v. GhavamDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1985
  3. Severn v. Adidas SportschuhfabrikenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  4. Severn v. Adidas SportschuhfabrikenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API