Legal Opinion
Minthorne v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 12, 1963No. Civ. 27076PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKingsley, J.
This is an application for a writ of man date to require the trial court to grant a motion to quash service of summons.
Petitioner, a resident of Arizona, was a defendant in an action heretofore pending in the Superior Court, County of Los Angeles, denominated Newfield v. Seeburg Distributing Co., being proceeding numbered 749051 in the files of that court. On September 30, 1962, petitioner came to Los Angeles from Phoenix in order to attend and to testify in that action. While he was waiting for the case to be assigned to a trial department, he was served with process in an action brought…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Funeral Dirs. Ass'n. v. Bd. of Funeral Dirs. & EmbalmersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Von Kesler v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Russell v. LandauCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Slosberg v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- St. John v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Severn v. Adidas SportschuhfabrikenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Severn v. Adidas SportschuhfabrikenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973