In Re the Welfare of M.E.M.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANDALL, Judge.
After being designated an extended-jurisdiction juvenile, appellant was tried and convicted of aiding and abetting aggravated robbery and third-degree assault. On appeal from the judgment and conviction, appellant argues that (1) he did not properly waive his right to a jury trial and an omnibus hearing; (2) he did not waive his right to testify in his defense, but if he did, the waiver was improper; (3) the admission of unduly suggestive show-up identification evidence violated his due-process right to a fair trial; and (4) the evidence to prove identity beyond a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- State v. OstremSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- State v. WalenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. EhmkeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
- In re A.J.B.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2018
- In the Matter of the Welfare of: A. A. S., ChildCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024
- In the Matter of the Welfare of: J. C. A., Jr., Child.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
- State of Minnesota v. Alfonso Domingo MartinezCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.