Legal Opinion

In Re the Welfare of M.E.M.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided February 3, 2004No. A03-245PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RANDALL, Judge.

After being designated an extended-jurisdiction juvenile, appellant was tried and convicted of aiding and abetting aggravated robbery and third-degree assault. On appeal from the judgment and conviction, appellant argues that (1) he did not properly waive his right to a jury trial and an omnibus hearing; (2) he did not waive his right to testify in his defense, but if he did, the waiver was improper; (3) the admission of unduly suggestive show-up identification evidence violated his due-process right to a fair trial; and (4) the evidence to prove identity beyond a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. State v. OstremSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  3. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  4. State v. WalenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  5. State v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. EhmkeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
  2. In re A.J.B.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2018
  3. In the Matter of the Welfare of: A. A. S., ChildCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024
  4. In the Matter of the Welfare of: J. C. A., Jr., Child.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
  5. State of Minnesota v. Alfonso Domingo MartinezCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API