Legal Opinion
Gilman v. Brunton
Washington Supreme Court
Decided December 26, 1916No. 13404PublishedCited by 12 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Clarke county, Back, J., entered July 27, 1915, dismissing ah action for specific performance, after a trial on the merits before the court.
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam. —
On November 1, 1913, the plaintiff and defendants entered into the following agreement:
“This agreement, made and entered into this 1st day of November, 1913, by and between W. B. Brunton and Opal M. Brunton, husband and wife, hereinafter known as the party of the first part, and W. L. Twitchell, hereinafter known as the party of the second part, witnesseth:
“Whereas, W. B. Brunton and Opal M. Brunton, parties of the first part, are the owners in fee simple of the following bounded and described property, situated in the county of Clarke, state of Washington, 48 acres, more or…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Thompson v. EnglishWashington Supreme Court · 1913
3Cited by12 opinions
- Martinson v. CruikshankWashington Supreme Court · 1940
- Rogers v. LippyWashington Supreme Court · 1918
- Nance v. ValentineWashington Supreme Court · 1918
- Murphy v. LivesayIdaho Supreme Court · 1921
- Marshall v. Hillman Investment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1929
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.